Page 47 - BPAReport
P. 47

57.    Various indications are used to  ascertain when  a situation amounts to forced labour
               such as restriction on workers’ freedom of movement, withholdings of wages or identity
               documents, physical or sexual violence, threats and intimidation or fraudulent debt from
               which workers cannot escape.5

               58.    There has been several reports of forced  labour practices and conditions involving
               migrant labour in Malaysia. According to several NGO’s and independent social audits, forced
               labour is a problem in Malaysia with migrant workers especially in the palm oil, electronic
               industry and manufacturing sector.

               59.    The issue of forced labour in Malaysia has grave repercussions for Malaysia’s
               economy and global reputation. Therefore it is imperative that Malaysia take urgent steps to develop its
               capacity to address forced labour in Malaysia.

               60.    The present laws against forced labour in Malaysia are stated in the Penal Code and the
               Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007.

               Other transgressions and shortcomings


               61.    Stakeholders  have made  reports  about unreasonable  and  illegal  deductions  of  wages
               of foreign workers to offset expenses incurred in the recruitment process as well as in
               fulfilling the Malaysian employment law requirements.


               62.    Complaints have also been raised that age limitation placed on the recruitment of
               foreign workers at 45 years is discriminatory and should be raised. Similarly they contend
               that not allowing PLKS foreign workers to bring in family members or to get married is
               equally discriminatory and against international human rights provisions. In any case, the
               reality on the ground demonstrates that these restrictions cannot be enforced adequately.

               4.11   Source country issues and MOUs


               63.    As pointed out above, there is also widespread corruption in source countries
               stemming from the use of selected, preferential and monopolistic agents for recruitment and
               pre-departure  training  of  prospective foreign  workers.  In  addition,  in  the  absence  of formal
               MOUs, the established recruitment costs charged to Malaysian employers as well as hidden
               fees imposed on the departing workers are on most occasions not transparent.

               64.    Stakeholders, particularly employers and those from civil societies strongly support
               the development of bilateral MOUs with source countries. However, they demand that the
               process be made more transparent and inclusive, and that the MOUs be disclosed to the
               public, with sensitive information removed. In particular, they insist that before the MOUs
               are negotiated with the source countries they should be discussed in consultations with all
               relevant stakeholders in Malaysia. They expect that a similar parallel process of consultations
               will also take place in the source country. This will allow the relevant stakeholders who are
               closer to the ground to provide their inputs and concerns to better safeguard the welfare of the
               foreign workers as well as the Malaysian employers.




               5   ILO Indicators of Forced Labour: retrieved from https://www.ilo.org


                                                           45
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52